|
Wednesday,
November 25, 2009 A
Real Revolution in the Making in the U.S. Health Care Industry “The
conservative goal has been the "Third Worldization" of the United
States: an increasingly underemployed, lower-wage work-force; a small but
growing moneyed class that pays almost no taxes; the privatization or
elimination of human services; the elimination of public education for
low-income people; the easing of restrictions against child labor; the
exporting of industries and jobs to low-wage, free-trade countries; the
breaking of labor unions; and the elimination of occupational safety and environmental
controls and regulations.” Michael
Parenti, progressive author and lecturer “As
to diseases, make a habit of two things – to help, or at least, to do
no harm.” Hippocrates
(460-277 BC), ancient Greek physician “In a
country well governed, povery is something to be ashamed of. In a country
badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.” Confucius (551-479 BC), Chinese philosopher The U.S. Congress is presently debating a most important piece of legislation that would profoundly reform the U.S. healthcare system. This is without a doubt the most important domestic proposal advanced by the Obama administration. To understand what is at stake here, one should know
that in the U.S., there are three industries that operate in a political and
economic environment such that they can literally write their own ticket: the
tentacular defense industry, the large financial and banking industry and the
pivotal health
industry. Together, these industries account for more than
forty percent of the U.S. economy. Their common characteristic is that
suppliers can more or less create their own demand and fix prices
accordingly. The potential for gouging is enormous. Needless to say, these
industries are among the most profitable ones... for those who can enter
them. The health industry is particularly insulated from normal
market competition and from critical assessment by the consumer. The products
and services that the consumer requires are “prescribed” to him
or to her. If sick or requiring treatment, the consumer is in no position to
argue and to contest costs and prices. He is not even considered a consumer
but a “patient”! In a medical establishment, he is admitted, then
“discharged”! Economists call such a situation a price-inelastic
demand. The supplier of the service is the one who calls the shots. He
decides the quantities to be administered and the price to be charged. This
is a cost-plus situation fraught with mostly unregulated monopoly pricing
practices. This may partially explain why since 1970, American
health costs have grown at an average annual rate of 9.6
percent per year. That is close to twice the pace of the
increase of the overall economy. For example in 2010, health costs in the
U.S. are expected to increase four times faster than the annual increase in
the average hourly wage of American workers. This is clearly unsustainable,
less it bankrupts the entire U.S. economy. Since medical treatment is in many cases not a
choice but a necessity, people have very little leeway in economizing on such
consumption within their normal budget constraints. If one requires urgent
treatment, one must willy-nilly enter the medical system and pay to the hilt.
An example observed recently would illustrate the fundamentals. A friend
visiting Florida recently had a case of severe indigestion during the night.
He was driven to the emergency room of a local hospital, where he spent two
hours. The total cost was in excess of $3,000, half of it for simply crossing
the door of the ER room and the rest for two simple blood and urine tests.
Maybe Walmart should take over the administration of U.S. hospitals! To protect against unforeseen medical outlays that can seriously perturb their financial position, most people rely on one form or another of health insurance. This could be private insurance, group coverage insurance, cooperative insurance or collective or public insurance. For example, members of Congress are covered by a public health insurance plan. Military personnel and military veterans are insured through a public plan, either through the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System or through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Americans who are over 65 years old are covered by a public single-payer health care system, called Medicare. Such a public American health program has been in existence since 1965. This is a large public health plan that presently covers more than 43 million Americans. It now provides comprehensive hospital, medical and drug coverage for those lucky enough to qualify because of age and residency. For the population at large, individuals or families can be privately insured, underinsured or less than fully insured for medical costs they might incur, or, for some fifteen percent of Americans, not insured at all (45.7 million people in 2007). Private health insurance companies routinely deny insurance coverage for people who have pre-existing health conditions. It has been estimated that the total number of people in the United States who die because of lack of medical care is about 100,000 per year. One can therefore understand why the issue of
comprehensive health care insurance is so politically contentious in the
United States. Those who are already covered by a generous public health care
program—by such public programs such as Medicare, i.e. the insiders,
possibly a third of the U.S. population—do not see an urgent need to
change a situation that benefits them. Those who rake in tremendous profits
in the private health industry are also fighting to maintain their privileged
position. Being already covered, they are less persuaded that there is such a
thing as a fundamental right
to health care. The victims, the outsiders whose health insurance is
tied to their job or who are not covered at all, do not have the same
political clout nor the same access that the insiders have to the media or to
members of Congress. Generally speaking, the Republican party and its allies
in the far right media side with the insiders, and vigorously oppose most
attempts for health
care reform and an extension of their privileged position to
others. Generally speaking again, the Democratic party and its progressive
allies tend to side with the outsiders and have been pushing for reform for
many years. Ethically speaking, it is generally accepted that
those who benefit the most from random natural endowments or from the working
of the social and economic system have a moral obligation and an inescapable
responsibility to share their good fortune with the less lucky or the less
fortunate among us. Naked egoism is the anti-thesis of modern humanist
morality. As to the political tug-of-war being played in the
U.S. around health care reform, it is too early to know the final result, but
it surely will have major consequences. Rodrigue Tremblay is
professor emeritus of economics at the University of Montreal and can be
reached at rodrigue.tremblay@yahoo.com.
He is the author of the coming book "The Code for Global
Ethics" at: www.TheCodeForGlobalEthics.com/
You
can reserve a copy of the book on Amazon
*****The French version of the book is now available.
See: www.lecodepouruneethiqueglobale.com/ or on Amazon. Register to be alerted when the English
version is available by sending the word “Code” to bigpictureworld@yahoo.com Please visit the book site at: www.TheCodeForGlobalEthics.com/ _____________________________________ Posted, Wednesday, November 25, 2009, at 5:30 am Email to a friend: www.TheNewAmericanEmpire.com/tremblay=1118 or, http://www.thecodeforglobalethics.com/pb/wp_26f7a0c1/wp_26f7a0c1.html Send contact, comments or commercial reproduction
requests (in English or in French) to: N.B.: Messages may
be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise. Please register to receive free alerts on new
postings of articles. Send an email with the word "subscribe"
to: bigpictureworld@yahoo.com To unregister, send an email with the word "unsubscribe"
to: bigpictureworld@yahoo.com The
above is presented for educational purposes only. © 2009
by Big Picture World Syndicate, Inc. |