Thursday, May 1, 2008
Permanent Wars for Oil and Permanent Terrorism
“Oil in the next war will occupy
the place of coal in the present war, or at least a parallel place to coal. The
only big potential supply that we can get under British control is the Persian [now Iran] and Mesopotamian [now Iraq] supply....Control over these oil
supplies becomes a first class British war aim.”
Sir Maurice Hankey, Britain’s First Secretary of
the War Cabinet, 1918
"Whatever their publicized angst over Saddam
Hussein's 'weapons of mass destruction,' American and British authorities were
also concerned about violence in an area that harbours a resource indispensable
for the functioning of the world economy."
Alan Greenspan,
Fed Chairman 1987-2006
[We
cannot leave Iraq because] "extremists [may] be in a position to use oil as a tool to blackmail the West... and they will do so unless we abandon Israel "
George W. Bush,
November 1, 2006
"When
there is a regime change in Iraq, you could add 3 million to 5 million barrels
of production to world supply,"
Lawrence
Lindsey, former George W. Bush's then-chief economic adviser, 2002
"Secure
supplies of energy are essential to our prosperity and security. The
concentration of 65 percent of the world's known oil reserves in the Persian
Gulf means we must continue to ensure reliable access to competitively priced
oil and a prompt, adequate response to any major oil supply disruption.":
U.S.
White House, "National Security Strategy of the United States", March
1990
When the Bush-Cheney administration took over in January 2001, the
international price of oil was about $22 a barrel. Now, nearly eight years
later, the price of oil is hovering around $120 a barrel, a more than five
hundred percent increase. Thus, as far as oil is concerned, things have not unfolded in Iraq as planned and expected by the Neocons in the
Bush-Cheney administration. First, they thought that gushing Iraqi oil would
pay for the invasion and occupation of the country. Instead, the cash outlay
for this adventure is likely to reach one trillion dollars, and the total cost
to the U.S. economy will likely surpass three trillion dollars.
Second, the price of oil is reaching record levels with no top in sight and
this is threatening to tip the U.S. and the world economies into a protracted
economic recession. This is partly due to the fact that Iraqi oil output has
not increased as planned and is rather below where it was when the United
States invaded and occupied Iraq in 2003. From a macroeconomic point of view,
this ill-advised and illegal war
has been an unmitigated disaster.
Nevertheless,
despite sporadic pious declarations about leaving Iraq when asked, the
Bush-Cheney administration is planning a 50-Year American military
occupation of Iraq. They do not want to set a date to end the occupation of Iraq, because they see it as an
open-ended military occupation. —This is to be expected, since the real
reasons they invaded Iraq in the first place was to pursue the long run goal of controlling
Middle East oil and of protecting the state of Israel from its Muslim
neighbors. Indeed, everybody knows that the military invasion of Iraq by
American forces had nothing to do with "democracy" or the wishes of the
people. It had everything to do with securing Iraq's oil reserves and with
removing one of Israel's enemies in the person of Saddam Hussein.
Last May 31 (2007), Secretary of Defense Robert Gates confirmed these
long-term plans when he said that the United States was looking for a
"long and enduring presence" in Iraq. That is the reason the U.S. has
built the largest embassy in the world, 21
buildings on a 100-acre site on the banks of the Tigris, which will be capable
of housing one thousand employees. That is also why they are consolidating some
100 plus military bases in that Muslim country into 14
permanent super-military bases – all geared to control militarily that
part of the world for a very long time.
This
is also why the Bush-Cheney administration is pushing the Iraqi Parliament hard
to adopt a law that would privatize the Iraqi oil
industry. If
the current puppet regime now in place in Iraq were to refuse passing such a law,
the so-called "Hydrocarbon Act", it would lose over a billion dollars
in reconstruction funds
that would be blocked by the Bush-Cheney
administration.
This
overt military grab of the oil resources of a Middle East nation is a sure
recipe for feeding permanent terrorism in the world and permanent war in the
Middle East for as long as one can see. And if Americans elect a Republican
president for a third term next November, by voting for presumptive Republican
presidential nominee, Senator John McCain (R-AZ), that is
what will happen since this politician is already committed to a one hundred year war
in that part of the world.
According to polls, a vast majority of Iraqis is opposed to the privatization of their oil
industry. Nevertheless, privatization of Iraqi oil is one of the main "benchmarks"
that the Bush-Cheney administration is imposing on the
Iraqi government.
It has installed in occupied Iraq a puppet government of its own that is
delivering the merchandise, even though some arm-twisting pressure has been
necessary. Last July 3 (2007), for instance, the U.S.-controlled al-Maliki's
Cabinet approved, with no Sunni ministers present, a US-backed draft oil law that will share Iraqi oil wealth between the three
main Iraqi groups, but which will, above all, let American and foreign
oil companies into the Iraqi oil sector and enact privatization under so called
production sharing agreements. This has been a key political target and even
a "benchmark" set by the Bush-Cheney White House, but so far the
Iraqi Parliament has balked in approving the required controversial legislation, because there have been many protests, many Iraqis being
very reluctant to adopt a policy of sharing oil production and revenues with
foreign oil companies, especially when they have been taken away from them "at gunpoint".
The
Iraqi oil industry has been nationalized since 1975, some thirty-three years
ago. Indeed, before the American-led military invasion and occupation of Iraq,
the Iraqi oil fields were controlled by the Iraqi
government through a state-owned corporation. This was the foundation for a
relatively high standard of living in Iraq, which had one of the best health
care systems in the region and was producing more Ph.D.s per capita than the
U.S. It is this prosperity and this wealth that are being destroyed by the
Bush-Cheney administration. Under their military occupation of Iraq and the
contemplated oil arrangements, much of Iraqi oil production and oil revenues
would fall under the control of foreign oil companies, mainly American and
British [Exxon/Mobil, Chevron/Texaco, BP/Amoco, and Royal Dutch/Shell].
One of the two main rationales for launching the illegal invasion of
Iraq would have been accomplished, i.e. to keep the flow of oil going,
under the surveillance of American troops, the other rationale being the
destruction of one of Israel's strategic enemies. — Many knowledgeable observers, such as Australian
Defense Minister Brendan Nelson, have confirmed that Oil Supply Security was
a paramount reason for the Iraq invasion and occupation when he said that maintaining "resource security" in
the Middle East was a priority. That is the reason why, when the
American armies arrived in Baghdad, in early April 2003, their orders were to
secure only one kind of public buildings, those of the Iraqi Oil Ministry. All
the rest did not matter.
Finally, let us remember that on October
11, 2002, the U.S. Senate voted 77-23 to give George W. Bush and Dick Cheney a
blank check authorization to launch a war of aggression against Iraq. Two current presidential candidates,
John McCain and Hillary Clinton voted for the resolution. Let us remind
ourselves also that ten days earlier, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had
issued a confidential 90-page classified version of the National Intelligence Estimate, which contained a long list of dire consequences to follow if the USA
were to invade Iraq. The report was made available to all 100 senators, but
only six of them bothered to avail themselves of the opportunity to read it. Thanks
to that knowledge, people have a glimpse now about how decisions were made in
Washington D.C. before the onset of this war. Even on questions of life and
death, improvisation prevailed on a high scale. And now, the seeds have been
sown for permanent military occupations, permanent wars and permanent terrorism
in the Middle East and in the world.
The price for such a misguided policy will
be high and will linger on for years to come. Indeed, many Americans are
beginning to see that there is a link between Iraq war spending and deficit,
and the ongoing recession and accelerating inflation. Such waste and spending
on wars reduce the amount of financial resources available to finance other
essential government programs at home, from education to infrastructure. They
increase the balance of payments deficit and force the U.S. to borrow abroad.
And when the Fed lowers interest rates to mitigate the banking crisis, the
dollar plummets, which feeds inflation further when oil prices and all other
prices connected with transportation and world-traded commodities go up. The
current stagflation is a direct consequence of excessive U.S. military spending
abroad. The sooner a majority of Americans see that, the better.
Rodrigue Tremblay is professor emeritus of economics at the University
of Montreal and can be reached at rodrigue.tremblay@yahoo.com
He is the author of the book 'The
New American Empire'
Visit his blog site at: www.thenewamericanempire.com/blog.
Author's Website: www.thenewamericanempire.com/
Check Dr. Tremblay's coming book "The Code for Global Ethics" at: www.TheCodeForGlobalEthics.com/
Posted, Thursday, May 1, 2008, at 5:30 am
Email to a friend:
http://www.TheNewAmericanEmpire.com/tremblay=1086
Send
contact, comments or commercial reproduction requests (in English or in French)
to:
N.B.: Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request
otherwise.
Please register to receive free emails on new postings of
articles.
Send
an email with the word "subscribe" to: bigpictureworld@yahoo.com
To
"unsubscribe", write the word "unsubscribe" and send it to:
bigpictureworld@yahoo.com
The above is presented for educational purposes only.
(Home: TheNewAmericanEmpire.com)
©
2008 by Big Picture World Syndicate, Inc.