To read about Dr. Tremblay's new book

The Code for Global Ethics, Ten Humanist Principles

and to order the book, click on:

USA

Canada

 

To read about Dr. Tremblay's new book

The Code for Global Ethics, Ten Humanist Principles

and to order the book, click on:

USA

Canada

 

Also, read:

The New American Empire

USA

 

The Bush-Cheney Gulf Coast Oil Spill of 2010

 

Comments (5)

 

 

Nouveau

 

Felicitations pour vos livres et prise de pensée

 

Affiché, le jeudi 17 juin, 2010 9:51 pm

 

Félicitations pour vos livres et prise de pensée. Je vous écoutais sur une chaine alternative; nous parlions de la crise financière, de la bourse et des marchés financiers. Comme recherchiste dans ce domaine depuis quelques années, je peux vous confirmer que vous avez absolument raison; que ce soit dans le domaine financier, médico-pharmaceutique, militaire, etc. Il y a vraiment une stratégie mondiale pour rendre les pays et les populations sous une gouverne mondiale de l'élite; avec un peu de discernement, on le voit.

Je pense que les contrôleurs auront du mal à tenir toutes ces choses cachées; l'éveil mondial devrait l'emporter; et un peu comme vous je fais ce que je peux pour informer la population à partir de mes activités.

Jean-Claude

 

New

 

More Information

 

Posted, Friday, June 18, 2010 12:13 pm

 

I just read your article: “The 2010 Bush-Cheney Gulf Coast Oil Spill”.

I have collected more information that is relevent, and will paste it here.

 

More Dirty Details From My BP Mole:

 

Fed up! Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal orders Guard to build barrier.

 

 

Cerberus: Guarding the Gates of Hell - Dynecorp, Pegasus, BP, Goldman Sachs - Gulf Oil Disaster Planned?

Redicecreaions

Commutefaster

The Liberty Forum

Atomic News Review

 

The ties that bind. Remember Rahm Emanuel's rent-free D.C. apartment? The owner: A BP adviser

Americapsycho

Telegraph

 

Freedom destroyed

Who's next?

Brasschecktv

 

THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Youtube

Community

Zerotolerenceforwar

 

Dan

 

New

 

Negligence

 

Posted, Friday, June 18, 2010 4:13 pm

 

Thanks again for a very detailed and focused article on an aspect of the longrunning implementation of 'Le Defi Americain' (ou Anglo-Americain).

I'd only suggest not using the term 'spill', as this was a corruption of the source orifice. Moreover, 'spill' implies an accidental occurrence, not a predictable result of intentional, cost-cutting negligence by public-be-damned corpocratic mandarins.

I've asked some of my countrymen what they presume the official US-Govt and commercial Fox-News reactions would have been had this 'accident' been perpetrated by France's Total “sauf que les batards sont des anglais de BP”.

The melodrama of the $20-billion escrow is at once absurd, written in sand, and pathetic. Not only is the present-value of cash costs to BP a small fraction of $20-billion, the actual damages -- still mounting -- may well exceed $20-trillion.

Anything less than the immediate arrest and indictment of culpable BP execs and US officials AND the nationalization of all BP and affiliate assets in all jurisdictions under de jure or de facto US control would impugn the credibility any US effort to assert sovereignty over its coast or protect the pecuniary and nonpecuniary interests of its citizens.

Actually, as the term 'gunboat diplomacy' originated with England's official protection of English opium dealers in Manchu China, the US should do what it much earlier failed to do under the oft-ignored Monroe Doctrine -- e.g., seize such offshore English colonies as Bermuda, Turks & Caicos, Caymans, Anguilla, Tortola-VirginGorda-Annegada-etc, and Montserrat. If that doesn't do it, we could move on to the socalled British Antarctic Territory -- and beyond.

Of course the US would never deal so harshly with England, as it began to serve as England's powerful useful idiot sometime after the 3rd US Republic was established after conclusion in 1865 of the War For Federal Supremacy. This perverse, corporatist-inspired subservience escalated after such antipopulist disasters as the 1913 RATification of the 16th and 17th (Taft) Amendments to the US Constitution, 1913 enactment by Congress of the Federal Reserve Act, and 1917 entry into England's war with its (literal) German cousins -- reprised officially in 1941, but substantively a year earlier through an insidious, point-blank, fish-in-a-barrel attack 03 July 1940 by Churchill (Le Plus Grand Batard) on Free French Navy ships grouped off Algeria after the June 14 fall of Paris.

When the USA, and England by extension, achieved nuclear supremacy, they gained the ability to pressure, extort, and abuse the rest of the world with near impunity. THIS FACT UNDERLIES CURRENT GEOPOLITICS.

And MidEast oil is among the primary foci of the Anglo-American corpocracy.

The English brought in the first Mideast oil well in 1908 in Iran, a country in which they and Russia had long competed for influence. The English invaded Iran in 1901 and bypassed the central government by buying a 20-year concession for $10,000 from the nonIranian warlord that controlled that region.

When England gained control of Iraq after WW-I, English oil interests sought to drill there for oil. They were unsuccessful until they partnered with US oil interests in a venture that created 'Gulf Oil Corporation'.

And now it is WE who are losing lives and other resources fighting in Iraq (and elsewhere) out of the 1930s English playbook on behalf of our oil barons and theirs, as well as for the successors to the violent Haganah/Irgun radicals which England, the US, and Big Oil retain -- at great PUBLIC expense -- to serve as their oil patch 'guard dogs'.

Sauve qui peut!

John

Answer by R.T:

My purpose with this article was to show that this was a programmed “accident” in the sense that Bush-Cheney literally gave the U.S. Dept. of Interior to the oil companies.

BP is half owned by British investors and half by American investors and this is a company that was the main reason why Tony Blair was so anxious to follow GWB in Iraq, i.e. to share in the oil spoils of war.

 

New

 

Petition

 

Posted, Monday, June 21, 2010 5:30 pm

 

I enjoyed the article "The 2010 Bush-Cheney Gulf Coast Oil Spill."

 

I have created a petition to try and put pressure on the government to remove BP from control of the Gulf Oil disaster.

Here is the direct link:

Petition2congress

 

New

 

Responsibility

 

Posted, Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:24 pm

 

I am very upset at the lack of urgency demonstrated by the current administration in dealing with the cleanup.

I do not deny that lack of oversight by this and previous administrations led to the horrible explosion, loss of life and environmental catastrophe being experienced in the Gulf.

If we can't stop the oil until August, at least we could use every means available in the cleanup effort. It seems apparent that is not being done. That is what has angered and frustrated me and so many Americans.

I agree with you that "public decisions have consequences that last a long time". I think that includes the despoiling of the Gulf of Mexico.

...However, to continue blaming the past administration for all that is wrong in our country and indeed our world is unwarranted. It is time for the Obama administration and its supporters to stop blaming the last administration and accept ownership of the many things that are currently wrong in our country.

They ARE currently responsible for the lame attempts at cleaning up the mess created apparently due to BP's profit driven shortcuts and the CURRENT administrations lack of oversight of all oil drilling operations in our waters.

The fact that several nations offered help in the cleanup effort but were refused due to the Jones Act which in effect says that any vessels used in such efforts must be made by American workers is an obvious political move that was designed to please the American labor movement at the expense of our environment!

Sacrificing our beautiful Gulf coast for politics is reprehensible !

I appreciate your considered opinions on this and many other subjects but strongly disagree with you on this one.

Bayrd

Answer by R.T:

 

Facts are facts and cannot be dismissed at will. My purpose with the blog is to show that public decisions have consequences that last a long time.

The current administration has not shown much leadership, besides talk and photo-ups, in this terrible crisis that threatens to turn the Gulf of Mexico into an oil sewage. The Obama administration is certainly responsible for that lack of response.

You mention the Jones Act. A lot of politicians stand behind that law. As you know, Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act is what is known as the Jones Act. It was created in 1920. It deals with cabotage (i.e., coastal shipping) and requires that all goods transported by water between U.S. ports be carried in U.S.-flag ships, constructed in the United States, owned by U.S.

citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents. Therefore, this is a very old law. It only proves my point that decisions made in the past have consequences today.

However, regarding the Jones Act, waivers of certain provisions of the act can be granted in cases of national emergencies or in cases of strategic interest. Why this has not been done in that case and in the case of the Hurricane Katrina disaster, I don't know.

The general idea that polluting industries or financial industries can regulate themselves is ludicrous, if not completely stupid. Politicians who subscribe to that notion are either idiots or very corrupt. I hope that you don't disagree with me about that.

 

Back to blog